npitti1077
Registered
Hello,
I am wondering if anyone has had any experience with the MIL spec MIL-DTL-14072, as it is the first time I am encountering this specification callout.
I am currently creating a first article inspection report for one of our customers in the Aerospace Industry. On their source controlled drawing, they call out "FINISH: SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIL-F-14072". However, they specify no type or class of finish. The SCD was released and has not been revised since 1971.
Is there a default class/type of finish specified in the document somewhere? For example, for MIL-DTL-5541, there is a "default" finish type and class if nothing is specified on the drawing, but I cannot seem to find a default type and finish in the MIL-DTL-14072 specification.
My other thought is that the SCD needs an update to callout a finish number, perhaps nobody has noticed this inconsistency, as this is the first FAI that is being performed on this part. We have been selling this part for over 20 years, and there has not been an issue with the finish as far as I am aware.
Please let me know your thoughts if anyone with more experience in this area happens to run across this thread. Thank you so much for any comments or thoughts.
I am wondering if anyone has had any experience with the MIL spec MIL-DTL-14072, as it is the first time I am encountering this specification callout.
I am currently creating a first article inspection report for one of our customers in the Aerospace Industry. On their source controlled drawing, they call out "FINISH: SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MIL-F-14072". However, they specify no type or class of finish. The SCD was released and has not been revised since 1971.
Is there a default class/type of finish specified in the document somewhere? For example, for MIL-DTL-5541, there is a "default" finish type and class if nothing is specified on the drawing, but I cannot seem to find a default type and finish in the MIL-DTL-14072 specification.
My other thought is that the SCD needs an update to callout a finish number, perhaps nobody has noticed this inconsistency, as this is the first FAI that is being performed on this part. We have been selling this part for over 20 years, and there has not been an issue with the finish as far as I am aware.
Please let me know your thoughts if anyone with more experience in this area happens to run across this thread. Thank you so much for any comments or thoughts.