Procedure Training
- Thread starter Milas
- Start date
Those changes don’t require retraining. Ask yourself a simple question: does this change affect how the work is done or what work is done? If there is no affect, then no retraining is required. A more snarky - yet effective - question is: retrain them on what?
There will be some changes that should lead to notification; examples are if you change the layout, placement or structure that might make finding important references a bit difficult or confusing until the users get used to the new format. An example is that you might move information from a paragraph format to a table to make things clearer. But notification isn’t training - it’s letting them know that things have moved or may look different.
Please note that you still need to review and approve the changes by at least one independent reviewer as you will need to avoid inadvertent mistakes…
There will be some changes that should lead to notification; examples are if you change the layout, placement or structure that might make finding important references a bit difficult or confusing until the users get used to the new format. An example is that you might move information from a paragraph format to a table to make things clearer. But notification isn’t training - it’s letting them know that things have moved or may look different.
Please note that you still need to review and approve the changes by at least one independent reviewer as you will need to avoid inadvertent mistakes…
Do a search here as this has been discussed many times.
Document release vs its related training. Which should come first?
Can anyone comment on this issue please?Pay attention to what Jim said. The issue is not training, nor documents. The issue is process control. And I stand by what I said in one of my posts on the first thread listed below: It should be noted that changes in the process and supporting...
Similar threads
