Teaching Quality! The History of Quality (from Artisans to TQM)

V

vasilist

With all the respect Steve , menkirt asked if there is somebody who could give him advise on how to introduce quality management systems in their Technical Vocational Schools to improve efficiency and quality?

I agree with you , but in a philosophical level. For the beggining i believe that mine and harry's points were...let's say "not bad".

I repeat i respect your opinion and i do not want to start a never ending dialoge here concerning who's right or wrong. It seems you used stable bases for your opinion. So let us see your piece of advice to menkirt. Thank you.

Regards

Vasilis
 
J

jrubio

From ASQ:

Occidental point of view.

The History of Quality - Overview

The quality movement can trace its roots back to medieval Europe, where craftsmen began organizing into unions called guilds in the late 13th century.

Until the early 19th century, manufacturing in the industrialized world tended to follow this craftsmanship model. The factory system, with its emphasis on product inspection, started in Great Britain in the mid-1750s and grew into the Industrial Revolution in the early 1800s.

In the early 20th century, manufacturers began to include quality processes in quality practices.

After the United States entered World War II, quality became a critical component of the war effort: Bullets manufactured in one state, for example, had to work consistently in rifles made in another. The armed forces initially inspected virtually every unit of product; then to simplify and speed up this process without compromising safety, the military began to use sampling techniques for inspection, aided by the publication of military-specification standards and training courses in Walter Shewhart’s statistical process control techniques.

The birth of total quality in the United States came as a direct response to the quality revolution in Japan following World War II. The Japanese welcomed the input of Americans Joseph M. Juran and W. Edwards Deming and rather than concentrating on inspection, focused on improving all organizational processes through the people who used them.

By the 1970s, U.S. industrial sectors such as automobiles and electronics had been broadsided by Japan’s high-quality competition. The U.S. response, emphasizing not only statistics but approaches that embraced the entire organization, became known as total quality management (TQM).

By the last decade of the 20th century, TQM was considered a fad by many business leaders. But while the use of the term TQM has faded somewhat, particularly in the United States, its practices continue.

In the few years since the turn of the century, the quality movement seems to have matured beyond Total Quality. New quality systems have evolved from the foundations of Deming, Juran and the early Japanese practitioners of quality, and quality has moved beyond manufacturing into service, healthcare, education and government sectors.



https://www.asq.org/learn-about-quality/history-of-quality/overview/overview.html

Title: China's Ancient History of Managing for Quality, Part II

Copyright: 1990, The Juran Foundation Inc. (Please contact the Juran Institute at 1-800-338-7726 for permission to get a photocopy of this article.)
Author: Juran, J. M.;
Organization: Juran Institute, Inc., Wilton, CT
Subject: Architecture; China; Cost management; Design; Government; History; Inspection;
Series: Quality Progress, Vol. 23, No. 8, AUGUST 1990, pp. 25-30


Abstract: High levels of design, architecture, employee training, cost control, inspection, and other factors characterize the history of quality control in ancient China. Early complex designs were implemented through sophisticated smelting and casting processes. Architectural projects showed control over design, planning, and construction. For example, the 84 square kilometer city of Chang-an was constructed in 9 months during the Sui Dynasty. Division of labor was complex. For example, in the Tan Dynasty, the textile trade was divided into 25 workshops within the Textile Bureau. Training of craftsmen relied on the concept of inherited crafts. Fathers taught the trade to their sons. A policy of collective living increased the likelihood that craftsmen in the same trade worked and lived near each other. For cost control, there were standards for the use of labor and materials. A variety of inspection techniques provided quality control. These included: mutual examinations shared by officials of different localities; routine patrol examinations every month or season; extensive final examinations; and selective final examinations based on sampling. Quality control in China has a long history, but conservatism has made it difficult for these practices to evolve and keep pace with modern times.


https://qic.asq.org/perl/search.pl?item=12368
 
Last edited by a moderator:

harry

Trusted Information Resource
I just want to post a little disagreement with two items in the previous posts. The "Check" phase (later renamed the "Study" phase) is NOT a check against the original plan for deviations. This action would convert it into Management by Objective. The idea of the Check/Study phase is to identify the impacts of the Do phase on the process.

Thanks for pointing that out, Steve. You are certaintly right.

I agree with you , but in a philosophical level.

Vasilist can see my point because we came from countries at a much different level of development. Taylor's, the Hawthorne studies and Maslow's heirarchy of needs are very much alive in my part of the world - including Menkirt's if I am not mistaken.

Regards.
 

BradM

Leader
Admin
While I believe I could mold a masters degree in quality, I realize that the poster is probably speaking in a limited time-frame. I'm thinking maybe this is a three-four month endeavor.

Might I suggest assigning them to write a book report on Deming's Out of the Crisis?

Have your students produce original thought on your objective; make them think!!

Reading the book once will not make them quality experts. However, they will start their journey with one of the greats. Too, as they suggest solutions, maybe that will give them the motivation to learn more about quality practices, the history, etc.
 
M

menkirt

Thankyou all for providing me with constructive ideas. I accept all advices particularly using TQM tools. My problem here is we are at the verge of the system reform process and many people are not as such welcoming the change endevours. I am an expert working in reforming and strengthening the effeciency of TVET system at a Ministry level. It came to my mind that it would be better try a change managent at schools .Just to give you a clue about our TVET schools: 1.The graduates are most of the time not favoured by employers because of poor performance. 2. Facilities in the school are most of the time underutilised and, 3. There is desperete materials management and shop floors are always dirty and shabby at most schools etc.. Then what paths of quality management do you recommend to keep this things at minimum.
 

LUV-d-4UM

Quite Involved in Discussions
I need help in veveloping Quality Related Key performance indicators. Background: I am a quality coordinator in charge of conducting Internal audits and supporting my company's ISO9000 registration. This year I wanted to improve my performance as the quality coordinator focusing on the company's business goals.
Thank you.
 
L

Lisa R Martin

Hello everyone needing some objective evidence to show that Quality does not report to production!
Here's the skinny: Old company ran in automatic mode for some thirty years just recently passed the TS 16949 certification audit. Now company is getting in to Value stream Management stating that the inspector/ auditor reports directly to the Value stream manager. Company has Quality Manager recently hired. Inspector written up for issue by the Value stream Manager becuase of the direct report deal. The only thing I have found in the TS Spec. is section 8.2.2. which deals with the internal audit. Another external audit coming very soon and I need to get the org chart repaired. How can I fight this mind set?
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
Hello everyone needing some objective evidence to show that Quality does not report to production!
Here's the skinny: Old company ran in automatic mode for some thirty years just recently passed the TS 16949 certification audit. Now company is getting in to Value stream Management stating that the inspector/ auditor reports directly to the Value stream manager. Company has Quality Manager recently hired. Inspector written up for issue by the Value stream Manager becuase of the direct report deal. The only thing I have found in the TS Spec. is section 8.2.2. which deals with the internal audit. Another external audit coming very soon and I need to get the org chart repaired. How can I fight this mind set?

Welcome to the Cove. :bigwave:

You say that (a) the inspector/auditor reports to the Value Stream Manager (VSM) and (b) there is a new Quality Manager and (c) the inspector was "written up" by the VSM because of the reporting structure. Do I have this right? What were the circumstances of the inspector being "written up"? Who does the inspector actually report to? There is nothing in 16949 that requires inspectors to be hierarchically independent from production; the requirement is that one can't audit one's own work.
 
L

Lisa R Martin

You have it correct. The inspector has a dotted line responsibility to the Quality Manager but a direct line to the Value Stream Manager. The Inspector hung the wrong tag on a cargo of product that shipped to the customer and then rejected by the customer.
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
You have it correct. The inspector has a dotted line responsibility to the Quality Manager but a direct line to the Value Stream Manager. The Inspector hung the wrong tag on a cargo of product that shipped to the customer and then rejected by the customer.
What's the problem you're asking about?
 
Top Bottom