Any more stubborn than auditors/people who demand labeling under all circumstances? If asking the person in control of the containers isn't possible (the old they won the lottery last night BS), identification is easy. If it's amber colored and the viscosity of honey it's A108. If it as a brownish tint and a light viscosity it's 1325. If it's clear, then it's E310. It's not rocket science.So if you have TWO unlabeled containers, what substance is in each container? This sort of stubborness reads as very petty.
Do you have ANY work Instructions? Are all the inspections being done on-the-fly?
Now the reason I'm stubborn about it is because of the beast the "labelers" want me to create. If we implement a label policy, then I have to probably double the number of containers as they won't be reusable, then have room to store them, and then "police" the labels (which can come off, get smudged, or otherwise become illegible). Chances are an unlabeled container will show up somewhere, and boom "violation" that has to be reacted to. All this for something that has no significant impact on our day to day operation. What sense does that make?
As to work instructions, we have plenty. Every job has a work order with all the instructions -- what tools, machines, and any specific issues to address. Measured inspections are done to print/computer layouts. The inspections done on-the-fly are sorting -- largely dependent on what the run produced which can be different each time. Usually representative samples are provided to compare.