Re: Corrective Action vs. Preventive (Predictive) Action (CAPA) - A Definitive Discus

If, according to ISO 9000 definition, we can request corrective actions against undesirable situations, are we opening a can of worms?
The standard clearly uses the "undesirable situation" and "potential undesirable situation" phrases, so why "if"? The can should be open and the worms should be all over. The purpose of the system is to rid us of em worms, not keep em in the can.
Trouble is that many potential and real undesirable situations can be spotted by knowledgeable employees, specially during the early stages of a working system. This can result in a ballooning of action requests, and eventual neglect of the system by those in the team that need it the most. This, itself, is an undesirable situation.
I don't think that requests for action should be discouraged. Instead, an indispensable part of any good CAPA system is to be able to prioritize such requests and to also be able to close out requests either without action or for later review when they have a low priority. We've been struggling with this since day one, but little by little, the CI is working on our CAPA system.