WALLACE said:
Would you agree that modern management methods for the most part practice the Continuous approach (By nature), thus infusing an MBO environment and intentionaly putting the cart before the horse?
Just my thoughts.
Wallace.
Depends on your operational definition of "modern management methods"

.
It is interesting, if you do look at many business books, and when you look at data analysis, they tend make their examples of a "trend" as a smooth increasing ramp. My experience is change is indeed discontinuous, and is a series of stair steps.
In improvement (and PDSA), where I would say the cart gets before the horse is that during the planning for the change the planners make an estimate of the expected impact of the change. Now, this is indeed necessary. I ought to have some basis to evaluate candidate changes, and be able to choose the one with the highest expected bang for the buck. But when that estimate of the change now becomes an MBO goal, or worst, some engineered standard (theoretical capacity of the equipment) is chosen as the criteria between success and failure, then we have problems.
The continual change model allows us to improve in steps. Probably a worthwhile discussion is not the difference between continual and continuous, but the interplay between continual (PDSA) change, and drastic discarding of old processes and replacement with a new "clean slate" process (Reengineering, and/or the Tom Peters "destruction imperative"). The difference between somewhat discontinuous and massively discontinuous.