All the previous calculations now have to be re-done using Risk Based Thinking. Obviously the "positive risk" is not to change the burnt bulb, thus consuming less energy and helping the climate change challenge.
All the previous calculations now have to be re-done using Risk Based Thinking. Obviously the "positive risk" is not to change the burnt bulb, thus consuming less energy and helping the climate change challenge.
Not really. Apparently any "climate change challenge help" associated with light bulbs is absolutely negligible when compared with the consumption of one average beef burger.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to the use of cookies.