That’s the crux of the matter. Imagine a scenario where an auditorsaurus is performing an ISO 9001 audit of an oil and gas company. This organization identified climate change as a relevant and significant issue. Interviewing top management, this auditorsaurus is told that the organization is gradually and slowly ramping up investments in renewable energies with focus on offshore wind power and floating photovoltaic systems. So, what? Does this auditorsaurus ignoramus who knows nothing about renewable energy start delving into that? How? What baseline 9001 requirements will he try to fit in that mold? Questions abound.So is climate change ‘relevant’ to many organizations - sure. But HOW the heck do you interpret what the addition to the standard says.
Meanwhile, some people in some of the ISO committees who have done the political work on behalf of ISO’s general secretary want to be praised for this asinine feat.