QMS Overload

Kurt Smith

Starting to get Involved
I am a new Quality Manager for a company. This is my first job "quality" job, my other experience is as a manufacturing engineer. I was a trained AS9100 internal auditor for my past job and was often tasked with reviewing and revising many process documents, so I am familiar with reviewing QMSs.
My situation is this: My new company is not ISO certified nor do they have what I would define as a Quality Management System. The owner has expressed a desire to be certified but has also shown it not to be a top priority since our customers have not requested it of us. I want to help this company to succeed, but this task is currently too daunting for me to decide where to step first. I've found un-released procedures that attempted to align with ISO9001:2008, but they were never implemented.
My boss is hoping to see results in the form of reduction of non-conformances. My brain is telling me to start with a receiving inspection procedure, but there are a lot of holes in the process before we've ever received these parts, both in-house and out-sourced machined parts.
My question is, where do I even start with this project? I know the best way to eat an elephant is 1 bite at a time, but would you start at the snout or the tail?
This isn't a helpful comment I'm making. But I would love to hear an update. Two months later how is it going? What has worked and what hasn't? What were the biggest problems? I feel like I would learn a lot hearing about the challenges of starting from scratch so late into a company's life.
 

Big Jim

Admin
You start at his feet, of course! Then he can't get away!! :)
The best way to start is keep a notebook & pen with you everywhere you go. Every time someone preforms a task, ask them how they do it, and document it. Example, contact a Supplier to inform them of defective material. Then you document it in some way. I prefer flow charts. Next, compare what is being done to what the standard requires. This will help you build a gap audit while also learning the processes at your new company. I started doing that at my job. The plant was slated for closure. Senior leadership changed and the facility did not close. However, they had let their certificate expire. I show up and there is no evidence of a QMS so, rather than totally recreate the wheel, this is what I am doing. Some of these team members have been here doing same thing for over 25 years. If something is required but not being done, I only have to ask them to change that one thing. That is a much easier sell than to totally write a QMS just from the standard. :)

Be careful with this approach or you may end up with a very awkward over documented QMS that becomes a monster to manage. A good deal of my consulting work is helping companies pare down their bloated QMS.
 

mindytanner

Starting to get Involved
Be careful with this approach or you may end up with a very awkward over documented QMS that becomes a monster to manage. A good deal of my consulting work is helping companies pare down their bloated QMS.
By following the method I described, I was able to reduce 36.2% of unneeded, repetitive, and otherwise "bloated" documentation. Its been my experience that most people performed a gap analysis between the TS version and IATF versions of 16949, followed by writing pie in the sky documented processes that took excessive manpower to maintain. Then they are lead right down the path to NC city.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
Be careful with this approach or you may end up with a very awkward over documented QMS that becomes a monster to manage. A good deal of my consulting work is helping companies pare down their bloated QMS.
Any approach can lead to a bloated system. If the developer has very little knowledge, experience and understanding of Quality they will struggle. The key is to understand what is valuable and what is necessary and be able to see and eliminate what is wasteful and not necessary. QMS’s are not “do what you say and say what you do”…
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Leader
Admin
I worked at one company that had a separate paper QMS manual for each and every functional department in the facility. Each manual was 1-3 inches thick. And these were not copies of one manual. There was a separate HR manual, a Maintenance manual, an Engineering manual, etc. Each had a unique number scheme, unique procedures, etc.

I quickly pared that down to a single thin manual then moved it to an online web-based format. The previous quality manager made the mistake of over documenting everything. Both in including non-QMS stuff and in going into way too much detail (i.e., sign off with black Sharpie brand fine point marker in Koine Greek using your left hand). Don't make that mistake.
 

mindytanner

Starting to get Involved
In my experience, it been most helpful to make sure that you are documenting what is needed for the organization to function. That is really what the intent of the standard, then other big organizations want to add in their expectations, and so on, and so on.
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Leader
Super Moderator
A small quibble: the intent of the standard is to achieve compliance to a minimum quality level.

In my experience in multiple industries I have had to exceed the standard in order to achieve company goals regarding Quality (and cost of poor quality). There have also been some things that I have had to do that had nothing to do with the ability of the organization to ‘function’ or to meet our high quality goals….
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Leader
Admin
In my experience, it been most helpful to make sure that you are documenting what is needed for the organization to function. That is really what the intent of the standard, then other big organizations want to add in their expectations, and so on, and so on.
The real path to a meaningful and sustainable implementation of 9001 is by deciphering the challenge contained in 5.1.1c). Not surprisingly, most people ignore, overlook or does lip service to it.

To this date, the overwhelming majority of organizations seeking conformity to 9001 fail to understand what a quality system is and how it fits in the organization overall business processes. Shame also on the TC 176 to fail to properly explain it and codify it adequately on the standard itself.
 

Parul Chansoria

Regulatory and Quality Expert
Hello all,
I am a new Quality Manager for a company. This is my first job "quality" job, my other experience is as a manufacturing engineer. I was a trained AS9100 internal auditor for my past job and was often tasked with reviewing and revising many process documents, so I am familiar with reviewing QMSs.
My situation is this: My new company is not ISO certified nor do they have what I would define as a Quality Management System. The owner has expressed a desire to be certified but has also shown it not to be a top priority since our customers have not requested it of us. I want to help this company to succeed, but this task is currently too daunting for me to decide where to step first. I've found un-released procedures that attempted to align with ISO9001:2008, but they were never implemented.
My boss is hoping to see results in the form of reduction of non-conformances. My brain is telling me to start with a receiving inspection procedure, but there are a lot of holes in the process before we've ever received these parts, both in-house and out-sourced machined parts.
My question is, where do I even start with this project? I know the best way to eat an elephant is 1 bite at a time, but would you start at the snout or the tail?
@DesantisJ
This can certainly be an overwhelming task, but if approached methodically it can help you achieve great results, and I say that because as you’d agree a company that is process dependent is much more efficient than the one which is person dependent. By implementing a quality system in compliance to the applicable regulations you’d ensure that the company has well defined processes with a focus on product safety and quality. This is no doubt a big undertaking. I’d recommend taking a 2 fold approach - Assessment followed by planning and prioritization. Here are some details:

  1. Assessment - you can take advantage of being new to the company and see everything with a fresh set of eyes:
    1. You can identify where things are inefficient and note those down as a possible area to address.
    2. You can check if there are higher occurrences of issues in any one particular area in the company like - service issues, complaints, part rejection, supplier issues, etc. You can keep a note of this.
    3. You can check open CAPAs (if they don’t have a CAPA system, then anything that is close to that) and see if there is any systemic problem that should be tackled first.
    4. Previous audit reports of their company (if it exists) from their customers or external parties, can also come handy.
    5. You can identify what is the source of all the non conformances, see trends, conduct or review root cause analysis, and try to pin down the recurring underlying cause for the NCs. Even though there could be multiple things leading to NCs, there can be one which is one of the biggest reasons.
    6. Any other analysis (at the site) and previous record review will also be helpful.
  2. Planning and prioritization - Once you have finished the assessment, put together the list of identified issues and a timeline to address those. You can prioritize based on business and customer risk - take a risk based approach here. Of course this should be presented to the stakeholders (you boss, management, etc.) as you see fit and they should buy into this.
With this, I am sure your company will appreciate your long term vision and the action oriented approach.

All the best,
Parul Chansoria
Regulatory and Quality Expert
 
Top Bottom