OK. To have an effective meeting:
1) An agenda. This is needed so people come prepared. If it is a regularly recurring meeting, people eventually learn the agenda. But if it is a one time meeting, you need to send one out. It's best if you assign TIME to it. Like for an hour long meeting 15 minutes on review of last actions, 15 minutes on presentation of new actions, 30 minutes of discussion. See "timekeeper" below. Also - do not be afraid to call someone out if they come to a meeting ill prepared. If you do not to this, many people get into the habit of showing up to a meeting with zero preparation figuring they will work on the subject DURING the meeting. This wastes everyones time.
2) A Leader. The leader steers the meeting. It doesn't have to be the highest ranking person in the room. This guys job is to keep the meeting on the subject so it doesn't get side tracked. This is a must have. This guy should be saying things like:
"OK - we are getting off topic, let's table this important issue for a later discussion."
"We are eating up time, and we have lots to cover, let's stay on topic."
"Please let person X finish there question before we jump in."
"Hey, person Y, you seem a little unprepared. We are going to skip your topic for today, please be more prepared next time."
3) A note taker. Too many times the leader (usually the person setting up the meeting) does this too. The result is the notes always suck. The leader is too busy steering to take the notes.
That's the minimum stuff. A designated leader. A designated note taker. AND an agenda. The most important thing a leader of a meeting also needs to do is evaluate how the meeting WENT so it can be improved next time. In general, this kind of stuff isn't done and consequently we get tied up into useless meetings that drone on and accomplish little.
A good TONE is also important. As much as we like each other, burning the first ten minutes of the meeting talking about last nights soccer match may SEEM to set a friendly tone. And in a small organization, that doesn't have many meetings this can be OK. But those 10 minute diversions add up to a lot of time lost in a larger organization. Don't waste peoples time. As much as it may seem like you need to set a friendly environment, MOST people will actually appreciate if you get in, then bam, bam, bam, cover each topic efficiently, and go on your way. The fluff and fun is good for sales meetings and the like. Keep it out of the stuff you run your business with. One thing I also see at maybe 10% of the places I visit, the production type meetings are done in rooms with standing tables. And there are no chairs in there at all. This keeps people from "getting comfortable" and using it as a break. Which leads to gossip and prattle and time wasting. Now, you don't want a 3 hour meeting at a standing table. But a production type/status update meeting should be brief. No more than an hour.
Some other things to consider....
1) You may want a designated timer. Who watches the clock and helps the leader keep the schedule.
2) You may want a "parking lot attendant." This person is like a note taker. But the difference is this ... the note taker is taking notes about the meeting that is going on. Sometimes this is pretty taxing. When someone brings up a valid point that doesn't serve THIS meeting, you typically table it for further discussion. Sometimes you say it goes in the "parking lot." The parking lot guy records THAT stuff. Different than the note taker. It's not a requirement, but it can help if a lot is going on.
3) Do you need "experts?" Sometimes something comes up and the decision makers/people in the meetings are not the experts. Packaging is a good example. Everyone has the "packaging guy" or the "shipping guy." Usually that guys in his own office off by the shipping/receiving area. Does a good job, and is generally left alone BECAUSE he does a good job. Not usually involved in a production meeting. But ... if an issue may need his expertise (like you have to ship to a different country suddenly) it may be a good idea to invite that guy rather than have the meeting regulars scratching their heads, or even worse, mouthing off with that they *think* that may be WRONG and suddenly it's policy. But that's a decision you make in planning.
4) Do not fall into the trap of talking about everything EVERY time. Some meetings are scheduled because you are doing a big project that spans months or years. And when things get critical, bosses want daily meetings. The trap here is ... between today and tomorrows meeting, you can only get so much work done. Don't waste time talking about things that are 3 months away EVERY time. You will suddenly be in a 3 hour meeting every day where you say the same thing every day. And wonder why you aren't getting any work done.
If you have a problem and someone says "We need to have a meeting," you are already wrong. The statement should be at a minimum "We need to have a meeting to discuss X with a goal of Y." You have to start getting into a culture of having an OBJECTIVE in the meeting.
Here are some of my personal gripes that may or may not help.
1) It's real easy to just click names in the meeting request on your computer. That sucks. Because lots of people get invited who don't have a dog in the fight. This will result in people not taking meeting requests seriously AND there are lots of people who like to hear themselves talk. If that person has no dog in the fight, you better believe they will still talk. And waste your time. So take the time and THINK about who needs to be in your meeting. This gets worse the larger the facility gets.
2) The meeting request itself needs to have enough purpose that people can be prepared. If I get a meeting request that says "Quality Team Meeting" or "Issue with Supplier X" or "PPAP Meeting" I honestly don't accept it. I just reject the thing. That invariably means the requestor of the meeting doesn't really know what they want. Maybe they just want a feel good session. I don't have time for that. At a minimum it should say:
a) what the situation is
b) what the urgency is
c) what the objective is
3) Use some statistics on your tasks. Everyone comes up with a task list and invariably at some point someone will put in a column designating criticality of the task. High, Medium, Low. Hot or Cold. Whatever. Shortly after this designation is chose, EVERYTHING becomes "Hot." Guess what? Everything can't be Hot. If it is, delete the damn column in the meeting tracker, because it's not doing you any good other than giving everyone anxiety of all these Hot tasks. I actually count them. And the rule in the meeting is - of the total tasks, no more than 10% can be High priority. No more than 20% can be Normal. EVERYTHING ELSE is low priority. Over time, everything gets marked "Hot." Then we have a reality check and reassign priorities until it goes back to 10%, 20%, 70%.
So ... there you go. Effective meetings.
